Why the UK’s Religious Establishment Will Lose

Another day, and more pissing and whining from religious leaders that faith is being driven out of public life by ‘militant secularists’ – seriously, that’s the Telegraph‘s front page today. Inside, Baroness Warsi gripes that ‘religion is sidelined, marginalised and downgraded in the public sphere.’ There is nothing like taking to the airwaves or the national newspapers to complain that you are being ‘marginalised’.

This is a periodic flare of self-pity from the UK’s religious establishment. Last year, the Chief Rabbi moaned that basic equality legislation constituted an attack on religious freedom. Lord Sachs complained that:

I share a real concern that the attempt to impose the current prevailing template of equality and discrimination on religious organisations is an erosion of religious liberty… We are beginning to move back to where we came in in the 17th century – a whole lot of people on the Mayflower leaving to find religious freedom elsewhere.

Are you thinking: if only! If only they would just sail away to some other place and leave the rest of us to get on with our lives!

Warsi and the Anglican cleric George Carey have taken their cue from a recent row over council prayers. A judge has ruled that prayers at Bideford Town Council are unlawful under statutory local government legislation. You can imagine the reaction. Warsi pledged that she would use her upcoming visit to the Vatican to demonstrate that the UK is still a Christian nation whatever Devon’s secular Gestapo says. She writes:

For me, one of the most worrying aspects about this militant secularisation is that at its core and in its instincts it is deeply intolerant. It demonstrates similar traits to totalitarian regimes – denying people the right to a religious identity because they were frightened of the concept of multiple identities.

Well, Iranian and Pakistani Christians might envy our ‘militant secularism’. I think, though, that there are problems with the approach used by the UK’s secular pressure groups. Of course we need a formal separation of church and state. But even Americans have to put up with public prayers and the meaningless, mainstreamed signifiers that religion has left with us. To fight Thought for the Day makes us look petty and stupid when there is real religious censorship and intimidation out there.

Richard Dawkins was on the radio today arguing that many people who self-identify as Christians don’t truly count as such in the traditional sense: ‘Many of them don’t go to church, they don’t read the bible – an astonishing number couldn’t identify the first book of the New Testament… they just tick the Christian box.’ Giles Fraser protested that people should be able to self identify how they like, and he’s right. The point is that increasingly even Christians don’t have faith as central to their lives, and their faith is so diffuse and content-free that it is never going to satisfy the government and hardline bishops who want a glorious Christian nation.

The political class is way behind the public on this. The UK is an inversion of the vulgar Marxist idea of faith. The rulers and elite intellectuals embrace spiritual propaganda and superstition while the common people have long discovered the joys of thinking for themselves. The religious establishment will lose because our alternative is simply better: more creative, fulfilling and interesting, the secular space offers far more for atheists and, in almost all cases, far more for religious believers as well.


2 Responses to “Why the UK’s Religious Establishment Will Lose”

  1. twlldunyrpobsais Says:

    “Many religions now come before us with ingratiating smirks and outspread hands,like an unctous merchant in a bazaar. They offer consolation and solidarity and uplift,competing as they do in a marketplace. But we have a right to remember how barbarically they behaved when they were strong and were making an offer people could not refuse” – The Hitch.

    But if I were asked the purpose of this religious blather?

    “Happily for the governing class,a well formed faith kept people from seeking their recompense in the here and now,through riot,insurrection or revolution.

    A temple was worth a dozen barracks; a militia man carrying a gun could control a small,unarmed crowd only for as long as he was present; however,a single priest could put a policeman inside the head of every one of their flock,for ever.” – Iain Banks, Matter.

    Slim down the state, push the royals, push religion? They want us back into the 30s.

  2. paul murdoch Says:

    “Slim down the state, push the royals, push religion? They want us back into the 30s.”

    I wouldn’t worry…it all comes down to a call for deference. Too late, the genie’s out the bottle. They’re never going to get the cork back in…too many emperor’s new clothes/ Wizard of Oz moments. Best they can hope for is #respect# (whatever that means). I was talking about this in the pub the other night: how many members of the British ‘establishment’-in a loose sense-do you respect? Came down to: David Attenborough, Tony Benn, David Moyes, Joe Calzaghi…and to my utter amazement-that he achieved a consensus…Nick Cohen. I dare say there are others we didn’t think of but I’m guessing we went through 300+ names…plenty I’d have gone for but lost out by one vote or so or nobody else had heard of. I’d have liked Melvyn Bragg and Ray Tallis, Michael Rosen, James Fenton, virtually no politicians were even muted and not a single religious figure.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: